Experts disagree on Google Chrome security claims

Can they improve on Windows' insecurity?

Google has claimed that users of its forthcoming Chrome OS will no longer have to worry about viruses, malware and security updates, but security experts disagree on whether the company can deliver on those promises.

Google said in a blog post that it was "going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don't have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates." An operating system should "just work," the company said.

Bruce Schneier, the chief security technology officer at BT, scoffed at Google's promise. "It's an idiotic claim," Schneier wrote in an email. "It was mathematically proved decades ago that it is impossible - not an engineering impossibility, not technologically impossible, but the 2+2=3 kind of impossible - to create an operating system that is immune to viruses."

Google plug-in turns Microsoft IE into Chrome

Redesigning an operating system from scratch, "[taking] security into account all the way up and down," could make for a more secure OS than ones that have been developed so far, Schneier said. But that's different from Google's promise that users won't have to deal with viruses or malware, he added.

Other security experts suggested that it's possible for Google to at least make a more secure and user-friendly operating system.

"Operating system vendors can do a much better job of hiding security from the users - taking care of changes without forcing outages and reboots and managing the security of all the other applications installed on top of the OS," said Alan Paller, research director at the SANS Institute, a cybersecurity training organisation.

"Google is all about the user experience, so perhaps they learned from the mistakes of the earlier, less-user-friendly OS providers."

Brian Chess, cofounder and chief security officer at cybersecurity vendor Fortify Software, said he's optimistic that Google seems to be making security a priority as it develops the Chrome OS.

"With the caveat that nothing out there is going to be 100 percent secure, and new systems... are going to have more problems than code that's been battle-tested for a long time, I think the Google guys are right," Chess said. "They could make a system that is significantly better from a security standpoint than the systems most people use today."

Google has a chance to start over from a user expectation point of view, Chess said. The company has several research projects focused on cybersecurity, he noted.

Google could, for example, make top security a default setting in the OS, instead of requiring users to change their setting to make their OS more secure, he said. And Google could build in safeguards that stop users from downloading a virus when they click on a link in an e-mail, he added.

"From a security standpoint, this is a great day," Chess said. "The question is, is the system going to be able to do a reasonable job of defending itself even in the face of a certain amount of user error? I think they've got a pretty good shot at it."


What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 500 characters.


Characters remaining: 500

Add your commentComments

nola | Published: 18:13 GMT, 09 July 2009

"But that's different from Google's promise that users won't have to deal with viruses or malware, he added." I don't see how those two rather loose statements couldn't be more or less identical from a practical perspective "It was mathematically proved decades ago that it is impossible ... to create an operating system that is immune to viruses." I severely doubt that. What mathematical proof are they referring to here?

Eyes Open | Published: 13:56 GMT, 09 July 2009

No new operating system can address the weakest link -- the user. Time and again, end users prove themselves to be the better fool when presented with a supposedly foolproof system. As long as end users interact with systems, OSes will be vulnerable to atack. And never underestimate the guile and cunning of vandal-minded/theft-motivated malware experimenters. Cheap thrills and ill-gotten gains have always brought out the best efforts of people to do their worst.

DanTe | Published: 13:00 GMT, 09 July 2009

So what's the difference between Chrome and Linux? Anyone?

JJP | Published: 09:41 GMT, 09 July 2009

Chrome is to Google the same what is Bing for Microsoft. Just wait and see

Getnikar Antakoff | Published: 08:30 GMT, 09 July 2009

Just get Linux, and make sure root's password is good.

JOHNNY69 | Published: 06:17 GMT, 09 July 2009

I smell a new beginning about to be launched! I don't want to get too excited yet, but if I was Microsoft I would be "Sweating Blue Bullets". Microsoft ..... paybacks are Hell. We have been stuck in the Microsoft loop too long. Change, and good change, is on the horizon.

Guitar Bob | Published: 03:26 GMT, 09 July 2009

I think a more user-friendly and secure OS can be built--providing the developer cares more about the user and good, tight code than about a continuous marketing cycle. However, I do not think that any OS can be completely secure because there is a fundamental conflict between security and ease of use/freedom of communication. Good luck to Chrome OS! Regards,

Related Security news

Hackers offered $100,000 for browser and phone exploits

Under attack at TippingPoint's 'Pwn2Own'

Cisco battered by large fall in security market

Rivals scoop up customers in Q4

Child porn blocked by new 'fingerprint' system

Uses police database of 400,000 images

Zeus malware now has Windows-like piracy protection

Hackers lock DIY botnet software to single PC using product activation code



Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

Techworld White Papers

Email archiving: Top 10 myths and challenges

This survey looks at a number of challenges and myths around email archiving that may also slow adoption of full archiving.

Download Whitepaper

Strategic mobile deployments

Deploying mobile applications? Supporting multiple devices? See why mobile platforms should be part of your IT strategy.

Download Whitepaper

Creating an AUP: Common myths & mistakes

Avoid the common myths & mistakes when implementing your AUP

Download Whitepaper

Legal risks of uncontrolled email and web use

Exploring the challenges facing IT Mangers today and vital steps to ensure safe internet an email use by employees.

Download Whitepaper

Techworld UK - Technology - Business

COLT White Paper

Virtualisation 2.0
Driving to higher ground beyond the basics

Virtualisation can deliver unparalleled efficiency and cost reductions to your business, allowing direct access to servers and guaranteeing a dependable, rapid response in times of crisis. Read this e-book to learn more about consolidation, discover the latest technologies and find out how to reduce the TCO of virtualisation.

Download E-Book
COLT White Paper

IT Misuse Survey

Complete this survey and you could win a Nexus One

Techworld are running a short survey to discover how UK businesses are managing Internet and email misuse in the Enterprise.

Complete Survey

Webcast: IT Financial Management: Cost Optimisation for Efficiency and Agility.
On Demand Webcast
Join this webcast to learn about the techniques and technologies that can help you prove the value of IT to the business by understanding the true cost of today's IT services and those that will be necessary to deliver future success.

Register Today

Site Map

IDG Network

* *