Microsoft wants Red Hat deal

Opponents say Microsoft 'out to scare people'.

Microsoft still hopes to strike a Linux pact with Red Hat, similar to its deals with Novell, Xandros and Linspire, according to strategy leaders.

"We'd love to do the same deal with Red Hat," said Tom Robertson, general manager of corporate interoperability and standards at Microsoft. "We're always open to talking with them."

That sentiment has not so far been echoed by Red Hat's. The company has said it's not interested in a deal. Red Hat spokeswoman Leigh Day said that is still the case.

"We continue to believe that open source and the innovation it represents should not be subject to an unsubstantiated tax that lacks transparency," she said.

Still, some wonder - as Microsoft lines up the other Linux ducks in a neat little row - if Red Hat might be next, and rumours suggest a pact might be imminent. Microsoft's latest Linux deal came last Thursday with Linspire, a deal that would shield the company's customers from Microsoft patent-infringement claims.

The deal follows one struck by Microsoft and Linux distributor Xandros, and a high-profile and financially significant deal with Novell late last year.

Microsoft has said it is seeking these partnerships for a couple of reasons. The one Robertson is most interested in is interoperability, as he - along with Jean Paoli, general manager, interoperability and XML architecture - is in charge of Microsoft's 18-month company-wide strategy in this area.

Robertson said Microsoft customers have demanded the company address interoperability issues with other companies' software, including open source, and that IP in those products is a concern for them. "If you look across the industry, you see companies working together to address IP on behalf of their customer base," he said.

Microsoft has publicly said that Linux and other open-source software violates 235 of the company's patents. But rather than suing to settle these IP claims, Microsoft is striking individual deals, Robertson said. However, much has been made of the fact that the company has not publicly disclosed any of the patents it claims open-source software is violating.

Robertson would not address why Microsoft will not show its patents, and stopped short of claiming the deals with Novell, Linspire and Xandros prove those companies are indeed violating Microsoft IP. None of the Linux companies will say so, either, and Novell in fact has vehemently denied infringement. This discrepancy is one reason some feel Red Hat will never sign up for an indemnification deal with Microsoft.

The size and business viability of the companies that have signed on is another. Novell was flagging when its deal was struck - and the company has continued to wane even since - and some familiar with how it happened said it was a bailout to save the vendor from being split up and sold piecemeal. Indeed, Novell's US Securities and Exchange Commission filing about the deal revealed that Novell got $348 million up front from Microsoft for patent cooperation and Linux coupons, while only having to shell out $40 million to Microsoft in return.

Though Microsoft will not comment on the financial terms of deals with Xandros and Linspire, those familiar with the agreements said those companies also received financial compensation from Microsoft. This begs the question that if interoperability and protecting customers are Microsoft's ultimate goals for the deals, as Robertson said, why is the company so interested in Linux companies that ultimately don't affect that many customers?

Many - particularly those in the Linux camp - suspect Microsoft is trying to make it appear that open-source distributors are violating Microsoft IP to vilify them in an effort to dissuade customers from using Linux and other open-source technologies.

Bruce Perens, a long-time Linux and open-source advocate, said Microsoft is giving Linux companies that are on the edge of going out of business money to create the illusion that Linux vendors are stealing its IP. Perens is a vice president at SourceLabs, a company that provides testing, management and certification of open-source software to users.

"Here is Microsoft out collecting the losers in the Linux business and paying them money so they can ... paint open-source as music pirates out there using Microsoft technology without a licence," he said. "I think they're out to scare people."

Even if this is the case, it takes two to tango, and it's important to note that companies such as Novell, Linspire and Xandros benefit in various ways from their deals with Microsoft. Aside from any financial compensation, the companies also gain access to Microsoft technology that would make their own Linux products more viable in the marketplace, analysts said.

"These companies want the deals with Microsoft because it will make the products more attractive and more compatible with the Windows world," said Michael Silver, an analyst with Gartner. "It's pretty clear that there is definitely value for these companies."


What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 500 characters.


Characters remaining: 500

Add your commentComments

leslie Satenstein (lsatenstein@yahoo.com) | Published: 18:17 GMT, 18 June 2007

What Microsoft is doing is putting fear into the consumer. I believe it is FUD to the user of LINUX systems for servers and other software that does not line the MS pockets. Every company has a life span that peaks and then declines. MS is on the decline.

Related Operating Systems news

Microsoft, Linux rivals mock Google Chrome OS

Operating system crippled by reliance on web access

Google releases Chrome OS to waiting world

Stresses speed and security of operating system.

NSA helped with work on Windows 7 security

Privacy organisations concerned about spooks' involvement.

Microsoft previews Office 2010 beta to developers

But pirated copies of the software are already leaked online

Related Operating Systems reviews

Jolicloud OS

Moblin 2.0 review

Ubuntu Netbook Remix



Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

Techworld White Papers

Database security: Preventing enterprise data leaks at the source

IDC discusses the growing internal threats to business information, the impact of government regulations on the protection of data, and how enterprises must adopt database security best practices...

Download Whitepaper

Service-oriented security

SOA has become an integral part of enterprise software by providing a framework to efficiently develop software as services that is easily sharable, reusable, and integrated. No where is the need more apparent than in the Identity Management space. Welcome to the age of Service-Oriented Security (SOS).

Download Whitepaper

Data protection prospective vendor checklist

Organisations need a way to map business needs against all these challenges in procuring a technical solution. To help, SANS has developed the following Prospective Vendor Checklist.

Download Whitepaper

Unlock the power of the mainframe

This whitepaper presents the notion of CICS as an integration hub based on a component-based, service-oriented architecture supporting Web services. Highlights will review the challenges and contrasted support for Web services natively in CICS.

Download Whitepaper

Techworld UK - Technology - Business

COLT White Paper

Are all VoIP services the same?

Questions to ask your service provider to ensure you get the VoIP service you need
With careful choice of partner, your business can have all the advantages of VoIP access - reduced costs, flexibility and simplicity - without the drawbacks.
This white paper is your guide to ensure you get right the VoIP service and details the pitfalls which businesses would do well to avoid.

Download white paper
BMC

Ride the express lane in the journey to speed ITIL adoption

Explore the challenges in making the journey to ITIL and the criteria for selecting consulting services
By following ITIL practices, your IT organisation will become more closely integrated with the business. We recommend making the journey to ITIL in a sequence of six incremental steps, the phases of which are driven through execution of a strategic transformational roadmap.

Download white paper

Webcast: IT Financial Management: Cost Optimisation for Efficiency and Agility.
On Demand Webcast
Join this webcast to learn about the techniques and technologies that can help you prove the value of IT to the business by understanding the true cost of today's IT services and those that will be necessary to deliver future success.

Register Today

Site Map

IDG Network

* *