Follow Us

Greenpeace attacks Samsung green commitment

Electronics company hasn't delivered improvements

International environmental group Greenpeace hit out at Samsung for reneging on a promise to remove harmful substances from its electronics products.

At issue is the presence of Brominated Flame Retardants (BFRs) in Samsung gadgets. The toxic chemicals have the potential to damage the environment and harm human health and their elimination has been a major goal of Greenpeace in the electronics sector.

Samsung was one of the first companies to publically voice support for a phase-out, and in 2004 issued a joint-statement with Greenpeace saying it would work to rid them from its products. The pledge earned Samsung points in Greenpeace's Guide to Greener Electronics and by 2006 the company was promising it would end use of BFRs by Jan. 1, 2010.

But that never happened.

In November 2009, less than two months before the self-imposed deadline, Samsung emailed Greenpeace to say that it wouldn't be able to deliver on the commitment, according to the group.

A delay wasn't unique to Samsung. Dell, Lenovo and LG Electronics had pledged to rid their products of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and BFRs by the end of 2009 but have delayed this until 2011 or beyond, according to Greenpeace.

What's different with Samsung is that the notification came less than two months before the self-imposed deadline.

"Most of the companies that committed to end of 2009 or 2010 timelines for eliminating these substances confessed to Greenpeace at least one year before the deadline that they would be unable to meet the timelines," said Iza Kruszewska, an electronics campaigner at the organization.

"Despite repeated opportunities for Samsung to come clean, including a face-to-face meeting in Korea in July 2009, Samsung continued to communicate to Greenpeace, and on Web site, that it would meet its timelines," she said. As of time of writing, Samsung's European website continues to show the 2010 goal.

The company now says it will remove BFRs from MP3 players and digital cameras by June 1 this year and from laptop computers by Jan. 1, 2011.

That late notification meant that Samsung avoided attracting a penalty point in the Greenpeace electronics guide until the last moment. It's got one now and Greenpeace threatened to remove another point if it doesn't speed up its progress in removing BFRs and PVC.

"Samsung is lagging far behind in the mobile phone and PCs product range, not offering a single model that is even partially free of PVC and BFRs," Greenpeace said in a statement. "If Samsung is serious about its green intentions, it needs to play catch up with competitors like Nokia and Sony Ericsson and Apple."






Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:

PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

Techworld White Papers

State of software security report volume 4

If your business has anything worth protecting, be it money, intellectual property or a trusted...

Download Whitepaper

New threats demand innovative responses

Financial institutions in the UK remain susceptible to further systemic problems, as challenging...

Download Whitepaper

Delivering a competitive advantage through IT

IT organisations share a common mission; to optimise investments and streamline operations to...

Download Whitepaper

6 tips to mobilise your existing ERP

Enterprise mobile users throughout the global business community will number 1.19 billion by...

Download Whitepaper

Techworld UK - Technology - Business

Techworld Awards

Techworld Awards Winners 2011


Learn who the winners of this year's Techworld Awards are. Video footage coming soon...

Find out more
Techworld Mobile Site

Access Techworld's content on the move

Get the latest news, product reviews and downloads on your mobile device with Techworld's mobile site.

Find out more...

Site Map

* *