Open source patent pool mooted and booted

Idea good but reality all too different.

A new plan by the Open Source Development Labs (OSDL) designed to protect open source projects from patent lawsuits has already attracted criticism from the US and Europe, with critics arguing the project will be effectively useless against the patent threat.

Software patents are useful for large IT companies such as IBM, Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard, which have large patent arsenals that can be used to lock smaller rivals out of competition, according to patent experts. Such arsenals are also routinely used as protection against other large IT companies, with big companies routinely entering into cross-licensing agreements to settle disputes.

Smaller, independent software developers and open-source projects are considered particularly vulnerable to threats of patent infringement. Large companies have also begun advocating minor reforms to the US software patent system of late, as they have become more frequently targeted by patent-infringement lawsuits such as the Microsoft-Eolas case.

The OSDL's Patent Commons initiative, introduced this week at the LinuxWorld trade show, aims to collect the software licenses and patents pledged to the open source community into a central repository. The aim is to provide easier access to developers, and to encourage more patent holders to pledge their intellectual property to the cause.

The OSDL hopes Patent Commons will help encourage more companies to pledge their IP to the open source community, following the lead of IBM, Nokia, Novell, Red Hat and Sun.

There's just one problem, however, said open source activist Bruce Perens in a Thursday talk at LinuxWorld - the plan is next to useless. For one thing, companies such as IBM and Sun donating the use of their patents to open-source projects doesn't change much, since those companies are "friends" of open source rather than "enemies", and would be unlikely to sue open-source projects anyway, Perens said.

A central aim of the patent pool is to give the open source community a body of patents to draw on for cross-licensing arrangements like those commonly reached between large IT companies. But this is unlikely to work, said Perens, because of the cross-licensing arrangements already in place.

In other words, potential enemies such as Microsoft already have the right to use patents donated to the open-source community by IBM, Nokia, Sun and others, Perens said. "The pool unfortunately turns out to be spitting in the wind," he told attendees. Instead, the software industry should push for legislative changes, he said.

In Europe the plan got equally short shrift from Florian Mueller, one of the main campaigners against a recent attempt to make software patents easier to enforce in the European Union. The Patent Commons could only be effective if it were able to provide the open source community with a real patent arsenal, he said.

"The software patent game is like the Cold War: the only thing that protects you is the concept of mutually assured destruction," Mueller said.

He criticised pledges by IBM, Sun and others earlier this year to allow open-source projects to use their patents without fear of legal action, but said the OSDL project could prove more valuable. "The patent pledges added absolutely nothing to the retaliatory potential of open source," he said.

In January, IBM donated 500 patents to the open-source community, but at the same time was one of the main backers of the proposed Directive on the Patentability of Computer Implemented Inventions, which critics said would have made software patents easily enforceable in the EU.

Last month, the European Parliament voted overwhelmingly to scrap the directive, leaving European software patents in a grey area. The European Patent Office and national patent offices have already granted tens of thousands of software patents, but courts in some member states have declared many of them invalid, making their enforcement across the region impractical.



What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 500 characters.


Characters remaining: 500

Add your commentComments

John Thomas | Published: 20:30 GMT, 18 June 2007

definitely not useless. sends a message to many IP companies that _if_ the contributing corporations (eg IBM) finds that the particular project is very good for its revenues, it _will_ step in with its lawyers, that could lead to cross licensing or simply deter the litigator

Related Applications news

Google Calendar gets new meeting tool

Smart Rescheduler suggests new times for broken meetings

Novell enterprise social networking tools ready for beta

Pulse suite for collaboration and knowledge sharing

Google Maps for Android updated

Android 2.1 users get local map wallpaper

Java creator backs Oracle and Enterprise Edition

James Gosling emphasises continuity with Sun



Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

Techworld White Papers

Email archiving: Top 10 myths and challenges

This survey looks at a number of challenges and myths around email archiving that may also slow adoption of full archiving.

Download Whitepaper

Strategic mobile deployments

Deploying mobile applications? Supporting multiple devices? See why mobile platforms should be part of your IT strategy.

Download Whitepaper

Creating an AUP: Common myths & mistakes

Avoid the common myths & mistakes when implementing your AUP

Download Whitepaper

Legal risks of uncontrolled email and web use

Exploring the challenges facing IT Mangers today and vital steps to ensure safe internet an email use by employees.

Download Whitepaper

Techworld UK - Technology - Business

COLT White Paper

Virtualisation 2.0
Driving to higher ground beyond the basics

Virtualisation can deliver unparalleled efficiency and cost reductions to your business, allowing direct access to servers and guaranteeing a dependable, rapid response in times of crisis. Read this e-book to learn more about consolidation, discover the latest technologies and find out how to reduce the TCO of virtualisation.

Download E-Book
COLT White Paper

IT Misuse Survey

Complete this survey and you could win a Nexus One

Techworld are running a short survey to discover how UK businesses are managing Internet and email misuse in the Enterprise.

Complete Survey

Webcast: IT Financial Management: Cost Optimisation for Efficiency and Agility.
On Demand Webcast
Join this webcast to learn about the techniques and technologies that can help you prove the value of IT to the business by understanding the true cost of today's IT services and those that will be necessary to deliver future success.

Register Today

Site Map

IDG Network

* *