IT Jobs
European Commission accused of open source 'bias'
Proprietary software groups have a whine.
By Paul Meller, IDG News Service
Published: 11:06 GMT, 07 July 09
Industry groups have both criticised and praised what they consider a bias in favour of open-source software in the European Commission's plans to update the rules governing industry standard technologies.
The Commission set out a plan for a complete makeover of the rules last week, a move it said was essential if European information and communication technology (ICT) is to remain relevant and globally competitive.
Currently, government bodies are limited in their choice of ICT suppliers to ones that are registered with a short list of recognised standards organisations, including ISO, the International Standards Organisation, its European equivalents the ESOs and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU).
Microsoft's open source guru strikes back
The private sector has moved beyond this short list. Fora and consortia such as the W3C, OASIS and ECMA are all standards organisations and are widely recognised in the industry, but they cannot be referenced when a firm bids for a public sector contract, or when an authority is setting public policy.
The reforms proposed in the Commission's white paper "should improve the possibilities to use and reference EU recognised standards in legislation and public procurement," the Commission said in a statement.
Open Forum Europe (OFE), an industry group that takes a pro-open-source view, welcomed the move.
"Strengthening collaboration and cooperation in ICT standards development, both Europe-wide and globally is crucial," it said in a statement issued Monday.
The Commission "recognises the importance of global open standards as well as important Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) concerns like transparency through mandatory ex ante declaration of licensing terms and royalty free licensing to enhance software interoperability," OFE said.
Open standards, stimulating global standard setting and standardization based on openness criteria across domains "can help usher Europe into a new era of competitiveness and growth," said OFE's chief executive, Graham Taylor.
According to the Association for Competitive Technology (ACT), the emphasis on open standards in the Commission's white paper amounts to a bias in favour of open-source software.
In a statement, it said it is "concerned that the policy framework suggested in the White Paper seems to favour open source software over proprietary software to achieve more interoperability."
"Our key policy objective should be the removal of systemic bias, not its introduction," said ACT President Jonathan Zuck.
Without decisive action, the EU will fail to master the information society and will not reach a number of important European policy goals that require interoperability such as e-health, accessibility, security, e-business, e-government and transport, the Commission said in its statement last week.
It added that if the rules aren't updated, the EU will be in a weaker position to influence an ongoing and global debate about international standards for personal data protection.
The Commission has launched a consultation with the ICT industry, standards bodies and consumer groups that closes on 15 September.
Add your commentComments
Europe to the Europeans | Published: 07:53 GMT, 10 July 2009
I do not understand why I should mind that the American lobby drone Zuck smears European regulators. But what concerns me is that the Whitepaper does not accomodate the market shift towards open source and open standards at all. Actually Zuck's US business partners wrote large portions of the document. As before with the European Software Strategy he plays dirty to obstruct policies directed towards European digital independence. But neither the Commmission nor our representatives are stupid, and they won't forget the bullying from Seattle.
Power to the Innovative | Published: 15:56 GMT, 08 July 2009
In a society which tends to strip individuals of their personal rights in favor of leveling the playing field, innovators get thrown under the bus. Those who are smarter, motivated and creative watch as the fruits of their talent and energy are confiscated and given away to those who are not as smart, are lazy or are not talented in a specific area. Such a society tends to squash the creative, innovative and forward-thinking individuals by removing their incentives to be that way - the opportunity to profit from their individual gifts. Why should the innovative struggle to create when they will be victimized for their trouble? History shows that they won't. They will either leave the society that oppresses excellence, or turn their talents against that society. In the end, the society kills itself through self-imposed mediocrity and stagnation. That society is called Socialism. The shoe fits, EU.